I'm reviving this blog again in 2023 so stay tuned!
Monday, December 19, 2022
Friday, December 23, 2016
Dealing with Toxic Family: The Smear Campaign
Here is a great article by Gail Collins on how to recognize and respond to a smear campaign you'll experience when you are the scapegoat in a toxic family. I wish I had read it years ago.
Gail Collins: The Smear Campaign
Saturday, January 23, 2016
NYT: In Case of Blizzard, Do Nothing
Having lived through more than a few blizzards in my day, I find the advice in this article spot on.
"Unless you’re a plow driver or a parka-clad elected official trying to look essential, one doesn’t pretend to do battle against a blizzard. You submit. Surrender. Hunker down. A snowstorm rewards indolence and punishes the go-getters, which is only one of the many reasons it’s the best natural disaster there is."
Check it out here. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/23/opinion/in-case-of-blizzard-do-nothing.html?_r=0
"Unless you’re a plow driver or a parka-clad elected official trying to look essential, one doesn’t pretend to do battle against a blizzard. You submit. Surrender. Hunker down. A snowstorm rewards indolence and punishes the go-getters, which is only one of the many reasons it’s the best natural disaster there is."
Check it out here. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/23/opinion/in-case-of-blizzard-do-nothing.html?_r=0
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
C'mon Barcelona!
Today at home in the Nou Camp - got to get 'er done against Arsenal!
Labels:
Arsenal,
Barcelona,
Champions League,
Europe,
Lionel Messi,
Premiership,
Primera,
Thierry Henry,
xavi
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Impending UEFA Crackdown on Big Spenders
The Times of London sounded the alarm back in November with this article and now it appears imminent that UEFA will restrict the big spending habits of some of Europe's richest clubs.
In a 60-page plan being worked up at UEFA headquarters in Nyon, Switzerland, clubs would only be able to spend only what they earn and not be allowed to take on large debts (and operating at a loss) to fund player acquisitions.
The entire effort is an attempt by UEFA president, Michel Platini (pictured above), to end what he calls "financial doping" – in which wealthy owners underwrite huge losses, and transition to a system where clubs can only spend what they earn.
These proposals, which UEFA intends to bring online 2012, will permit owners to fund losses for a transitional period but under close scrutiny by the governing body. Initially losses of up to €45 million would be acceptable in the three years up to 2015. After that, the number will drop to €30 million over the next three years, with UEFA finally reaching a point where clubs are breaking even.
It seems these proposals are intended to fulfill two objectives. First, the ensure the solvency of Europe's biggest clubs to ensure their financial survival in tough economic times and secondly, to level the financial playing field in the European game; bolstering competition and making the leagues more attractive to fans who are tiring of seeing the same handful of clubs win all the trophies.
While much of the attention in the English language press has focused on the Premiership clubs, the need for these new rules is most starkly displayed in the Spanish Primera, where club revenues average €72 million but average net debt is €860 million - the kind of ratios we're used to seeing in failing Wall Street banks, not big football clubs.
Will these new rules have the desired effect or will clever owners find a way to circumvent them, by (for example) funding player bonuses through advertising schemes, etc? Or, will the big clubs. with broad brand recognition, continue to outpace the smaller clubs in revenues and stay on top? Only time will tell but its obvious that you won't see much change on this until the 2018-2020 timeframe when the policy (if it survives) is fully in effect and operating through two full transfer cycles.
In a 60-page plan being worked up at UEFA headquarters in Nyon, Switzerland, clubs would only be able to spend only what they earn and not be allowed to take on large debts (and operating at a loss) to fund player acquisitions.
The entire effort is an attempt by UEFA president, Michel Platini (pictured above), to end what he calls "financial doping" – in which wealthy owners underwrite huge losses, and transition to a system where clubs can only spend what they earn.
These proposals, which UEFA intends to bring online 2012, will permit owners to fund losses for a transitional period but under close scrutiny by the governing body. Initially losses of up to €45 million would be acceptable in the three years up to 2015. After that, the number will drop to €30 million over the next three years, with UEFA finally reaching a point where clubs are breaking even.
It seems these proposals are intended to fulfill two objectives. First, the ensure the solvency of Europe's biggest clubs to ensure their financial survival in tough economic times and secondly, to level the financial playing field in the European game; bolstering competition and making the leagues more attractive to fans who are tiring of seeing the same handful of clubs win all the trophies.
While much of the attention in the English language press has focused on the Premiership clubs, the need for these new rules is most starkly displayed in the Spanish Primera, where club revenues average €72 million but average net debt is €860 million - the kind of ratios we're used to seeing in failing Wall Street banks, not big football clubs.
Will these new rules have the desired effect or will clever owners find a way to circumvent them, by (for example) funding player bonuses through advertising schemes, etc? Or, will the big clubs. with broad brand recognition, continue to outpace the smaller clubs in revenues and stay on top? Only time will tell but its obvious that you won't see much change on this until the 2018-2020 timeframe when the policy (if it survives) is fully in effect and operating through two full transfer cycles.
Monday, March 8, 2010
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Cell Phone
1.
Wait –
I don’t recognize that number.
2.
Among five pillows,
the cell phone is
the only thing that
moves.
3.
I lost my memory
which
I carefully placed in my phone.
4.
The cell phone sank
to the bottom of the sea.
For a fleeting moment,
it floated.
5.
How easily I clamped this ball
and chain upon my hip.
I can't decide if I prefer
"hands-free".
6.
Stranger becomes friend.
Finally,
face-to-face.
7.
See the added appendage.
People are driving.
People are confused.
“Resistance is futile.”
8.
Shrill disco ringtones
are a sign
of
low self-esteem.
9.
At the sight of hoards
talking
to themselves,
I looked
to the sky
for a cell phone tower.
10.
Microwave tooth decay
is a silent epidemic.
11.
The new president was advised
to throw away his Blackberry.
The People bought him
an I-phone
and he has never looked back.
12.
The highway is growing.
We are going
toward
alienation.
13.
It was business as usual
as the empire crumbled.
The cell phone kept ringing.
Holly Troy 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)